优惠:AlphaRacks 9.95/年/512MB/15GB空间/6TB流量/OVZ/洛杉矶
官网地址：https://www.alpharacks.com/
AlphaRacks，推出了万圣节优惠，如下：
流量三倍
端口升级到1Gbps
Linux 1
内存:512 MB
硬盘:15 GB（RAID10）
流量:2 TB /月
IPv4:1个
$9.95/年
购买链接
Linux 2
内存:2 GB
硬盘:40 GB（RAID10）
流量:3 TB /月
IPv4:1个
$19/年
购买链接
Linux 3
内存:4 GB
硬盘:200 GB（RAID10）
流量:5 TB /月
IPv4:1个
$10/月
购买链接
以下是三款windows vps：
Windows 1
CPU：1
内存:1 GB
硬盘:30 GB（RAID10）
流量:1.5 TB /月（100Mbps）
IPv4:1个
$6.85/月
购买链接
Windows 2
CPU：2
内存:2 GB
硬盘:50 GB（RAID10）
流量:3 TB /月（100Mbps）
IPv4:1个
$12.85/月
购买链接
Windows 3
CPU：4
内存:4 GB
硬盘:100 GB（RAID10）
流量:6 TB /月（100Mbps）
IPv4:1个
$24.85/月
购买链接
数据中心和速度测试：
洛杉矶（QuadraNet）：198.55.111.5 http://repos.lax-noc.com/speedtests/100mb.bin
附网友测试的数据，２Ｇ内存的。
系统信息及带宽测试：
System Info
———–
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
CPU Cores : 4
Frequency : 2400.088 MHz
Memory : 2048 MB
Swap : 2048 MB
Uptime : 46 min,
OS : CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab117.14
Hostname : zhujiwiki
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
———————
Your public IPv4 is 155.254.xxx.xxx
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 17.0MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 4.35MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 9.73MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 9.83MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 11.4MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 7.54MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.86MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 2.87MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 2.77MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 9.90MB/s
Disk Speed
———-
I/O (1st run) : 154 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 101 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 119 MB/s
Average I/O : 124.667 MB/s
UnixBench跑分：
Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 26 2016 21:26:10 – 21:54:29
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21023244.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2767.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2442.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 392193.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 107283.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1002805.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 943869.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 102398.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5530.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3242.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 979.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1362820.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21023244.2 1801.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2767.1 503.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 2442.3 568.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 392193.1 990.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 107283.7 648.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1002805.3 1729.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 943869.0 758.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 102398.4 256.0
Process Creation 126.0 5530.4 438.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3242.1 764.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 979.7 1632.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1362820.6 908.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 785.6
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 26 2016 21:54:29 – 22:23:13
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 64390692.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10901.8 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5519.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 210974.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 109774.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1133735.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3208545.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 459173.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18587.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9979.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1311.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3533070.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 64390692.0 5517.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10901.8 1982.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 5519.2 1283.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 210974.8 532.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 109774.5 663.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1133735.7 1954.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3208545.8 2579.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 459173.5 1147.9
Process Creation 126.0 18587.6 1475.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9979.3 2353.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1311.4 2185.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3533070.0 2355.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1682.1
服务器 I/O 性能：
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.40685 s, 78.8 MB/s
国内速度：
丢包测试：
Ping from 192.168.1.186 to 155.254.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
10/27 09:23:23.485 Ping to 155.254.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
10/27 09:23:23.785 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=221ms TTL=51, ave=221.00ms
10/27 09:23:24.716 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=212ms TTL=51, ave=216.50ms
10/27 09:23:25.718 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=227ms TTL=51, ave=220.00ms
10/27 09:23:27.765 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=274ms TTL=51, ave=232.00ms
10/27 09:23:30.779 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=277ms TTL=51, ave=241.00ms
10/27 09:23:33.816 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=318ms TTL=51, ave=248.55ms
10/27 09:23:42.817 === 20 有效发送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丢失, 260.95ms 平均值 ===
— 结果 & 统计信息 ——————————————————
开始时间: 2016/10/27 09:23:23
经过时间: 000:00:19
结束时间: 2016/10/27 09:23:42
—————-
20 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
—————-
20 有效发送
20 有效接收
0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 212ms, 最大值 318ms, 平均值 260.95ms
总评：
10刀的算是玩具了，网友反馈此家限制比的比较厉害，如cpu，内存什么的，一多会kill进程或者当机。速度如果不好，给再多流量也是没用。所以此家超售是肯定了，看是否合理。建议买2G内存的机子，相对MJJ会少很多。